Jul 31 2021

Greg O.‘s Garage: Plans for the Meadowbrook Country Club Motor Parkway Bridge


Once again, Bill Cruickshank has gone into his grandfather Otto McCamish's archives and photos and sent original plans for the construction of the 2nd bridge going over the Motor Parkway at Roosevelt Field to link the Meadowbrook Country Club's properties.

Greg O.

In 1926 the Meadowbrook Country Club acquired land adjacent to the Motor parkway on the North side and had planned for 3 new polo fields.. Their club, located on the south side of the parkway, would be in need of a dedicated bridge directly on the west side of the then current Roosevelt Field bridge to connect the new polo fields to their south side property.

This letter, dated January 7th, 1926, proposes the idea of a bridge to Willie K. Vanderbilt.

These original October 1928 plans came from Bill Cruickshank's grandfather, Meadowbrook lodge keeper, Otto McCamish, and are greatly appreciated.

The following are the details that went along with the bridge plans to describe construction, materials and labor for bridge construction.

At this time, it is unclear who paid for this bridge, but there is a clue in these detail plans stating; "The site of the work together with any permission or franchise that may be necessary, to be provided by the purchaser." This likely means bridge construction costs would be covered by the Meadowbrook Country Club making it possibly the only bridge not paid for by The Motor Parkway Corp. or New York State.

"The bridge will have a clear span of 30 feet...have a headroom clearance at 12 feet."

Bridge approaches will be 26 feet wide and 200 feet long from the centerline of the parkway. The northerly approach will be fanned out in a west and northern direction for entrance from the west and north. Confirmation that bridge was indeed to the west of the Roosevelt Field bridge.

Higher approach railings for the horses were necessary and constructed of cement and 2x6 boards. A hand written notation on the side states 12 foot long boards were used. Not 2, not 4, but 3 'good' coats of white paint were also specified for the railings.

Page 3 details concrete mixing proportions "1 volume cement, 2 volumes of sand, and 4 volumes of gravel." Careful attention was made to the cement consistency and making sure coarse aggregate was away from the face of the forms. Equal attention to the quality of the Portland cement, sand and gravel was also paramount. Reading these plans it becomes clear why these bridges were difficult to remove when they finally came down.

Water was supplied from the country club's supply to which the contractor had to run pipes to the building site.

Concrete form detail stating the forms needed to be very strong to bear the weight of the concrete.

All exposed concrete will be 'rubbed down with a suitable abrasive substance" and a mixture of fine sand and white cement ground into the exposed surfaces, with the exception of the underside of the bridges' floor slab.

Billet stock steel reinforcement was used throughout and can be seen below in the photo of the bridge being removed.

Six 'reasonably rust-free' 'I' beams will rest upon the steel bearing plates of the abutments.

Again here, exposed steel was painted and the plans clearly specify 3 coats. Two coats of red and a final coat of Graphite paint.

The last paragraph details the need for the least interference of parkway traffic, signage, lighting and flag men.

A big question with these plans is; Why did a lodge keeper, Otto McCamish have these plans in the first place? A clue can be found hand-written at the bottom of the last page; "O. McCamish Sup." possibly meaning that Otto McCamish was a supervisor on the project for the country club. Bill Cruickshank was unsure about his grandfather's role in the construction of the bridge.

While these plans compiled by Art Kleiner, were for the 1944 removal of the bridge, they do contain some of the same information as described for the construction plans.

During construction of the Meadowbrook Country Club Bridge courtesy of Bill Cruickshank and the McCamish collection showing 'I' beams before they were covered and the large cement mixer on the south east side.

A north east view of the twin bridges as they appeared during use. The newer Meadowbrook Bridge closer on the left.

Originally thought to be a photo during construction, further examination points to this being more likely during demolition. Exposed steel reinforcement seen as the abutments were removed in layers.



Comments

Aug 01 2021 al velocci 9:20 AM

Greg,  At the left center of the photo showing the two bridges, isn’t that one of the polo fields ?

Aug 01 2021 Greg O. 9:29 AM

Al, It is. Wider shot below.

image
Aug 01 2021 al velocci 11:52 AM

Greg, So,  isn’t that view to the north east ?

Aug 01 2021 Greg O. 1:23 PM

Correct. Typo in my text, Fixed! thanks for that catch!

Aug 02 2021 al velocci 12:01 AM

Greg, If the cement mixer is on the east side, doesn’t that indicate the new bridge is east of the Motor Parkway bridge ?

Aug 02 2021 Greg O. 7:51 AM

Al, my thought is that the mixer is on the south east corner accessible on the original road from Stewart Ave.

Aug 02 2021 Greg O. 7:58 AM

Excuse the crude markings, but red x would be the mixer with the roadway approaching the original Roosevelt Field bridge being used for the supply trucks. Mixed cement is then brought across the original roadway to the new bridge on the west side.

image
Aug 02 2021 al velocci 9:29 AM

Greg,  I would have located the mixer on the west side. More efficient, safer and no chance of damage to the roadway.

Aug 02 2021 Greg O. 9:54 AM

That’s a pretty large piece of equipment, maybe on the west side it would’ve possibly been in the way of the new approaches and construction?

Aug 02 2021 Brian D McCarthy 12:36 PM

The main photo with the cement mixer - From what I can see, there’s not a slope yet on the south side of the Polo Club Bridge under construction. Think the mixer is situated between the bridges. There would be enough space for the mixer at this point. When the actual bridge was done, the mixer would be out of way, then the road and slope on the south side would be constructed. Not the norm to build it this way, but done this way due to the existing LIMP bridge being so near. The Polo Club Bridge was definitely west of the LIMP Bridge. Has the higher and different bridge walls in the aerial viewed north east.

Aug 04 2021 al velocci 12:57 PM

Greg,  Your Aug. 2, with the red x, you mention the cement being brought across the original roadway to the new bridge. That road was not there prior to the building of the Meadow Brook Club bridge.  Check mystery photo of Oct. 27,  2014. Check larger version of the photo dated June 16, 1927. There is no straight paved road from Stewart Ave., north to the Parkway, only two angular roadways from one from the west and one from the east coming together at the original Motor Parkway bridge.  Thanks to Howard, there are many aerial photos of the area spanning a number of years, none show a paved road until the building if the Meadow Brook Club bridge.

Aug 04 2021 al velocci 1:04 PM

Brian, You mention that you think the mixer is located between the 2 bridges, both bridges had ramps on both sides of the Parkway that were at least 200 feet long,  the photo shows the mixer next to one of the embankments, not much room to work with.

Aug 05 2021 frank femenias 1:48 PM

Gentlemen, I believe the photographer facing two bridges is looking SE. The mixer appears just east of both bridges, in the dirt, between Motor Pkwy and Stewart. I don’t believe that’s the polo field in the back. I’m curious to know how the concrete was delivered

image image
Aug 06 2021 al velocci 12:36 PM

Frank, Your question about how was the concrete delivered. It probably wasn’t but rather mixed on site. Better control that way, proper materials, right ratios, correct timing on mixing, no worries about delivery schedules, etc .

Aug 07 2021 Greg O. 2:34 PM

Playing around with a colorization app…

image
Aug 07 2021 frank femenias 3:07 PM

Wow, that’s awesome Greg. The colors look accurate!

Aug 10 2021 frank femenias 2:22 AM

What an amazing rare photograph of the twin bridges!  Thank you all that contributed!

Aug 11 2021 frank femenias 1:08 AM

Al - I believe you are correct; having the concrete mixer onsite was the most efficient means to distribute the concrete locally, allowing completion of the new bridge with its descending ramps, along with adding new descending ramps for the original Roosevelt Field highway bridge.

Aug 18 2021 Tom 4:51 PM

I like the color picture too, looks more fresh.

Leave a Comment